<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 718 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325534</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the use of the Berry ratio as the Most Appropriate Method (MAM) for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) in a transfer pricing dispute. The Tribunal rejected the Resale Price Method (RPM) due to substantial value-added services provided by the assessee to its associated enterprises. Working capital adjustments were denied for lack of evidence on its impact, but adjustments for foreign exchange fluctuations were directed. The decision emphasized aligning profits with value-added expenses and recognized the importance of considering foreign exchange effects in transfer pricing assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:54:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 718 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325534</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the use of the Berry ratio as the Most Appropriate Method (MAM) for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) in a transfer pricing dispute. The Tribunal rejected the Resale Price Method (RPM) due to substantial value-added services provided by the assessee to its associated enterprises. Working capital adjustments were denied for lack of evidence on its impact, but adjustments for foreign exchange fluctuations were directed. The decision emphasized aligning profits with value-added expenses and recognized the importance of considering foreign exchange effects in transfer pricing assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>