https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2742 The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Revenue, setting aside the impugned order and upholding the order of the adjudicating authority. The classification of the product "QUI-9" was determined to fall under Chapter sub-heading 3003.20 based on the prominent display of the product name on the labels, contrary to the claim for classification under sub-heading No. 3003.10. The judgment underscores the importance of labeling and naming in the classification of products under specific tariff headings, emphasizing adherence to classification rules guided by product characteristics and labeling information. en-us Fri, 28 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2742 The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Revenue, setting aside the impugned order and upholding the order of the adjudicating authority. The classification of the product "QUI-9" was determined to fall under Chapter sub-heading 3003.20 based on the prominent display of the product name on the labels, contrary to the claim for classification under sub-heading No. 3003.10. The judgment underscores the importance of labeling and naming in the classification of products under specific tariff headings, emphasizing adherence to classification rules guided by product characteristics and labeling information. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 28 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2742