<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 707 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325523</link>
    <description>Revocation of Central Excise registration was held invalid where it was made on a one-sided basis without prior notice, hearing, or disclosure of effective reasons. An administrative order affecting civil consequences must comply with natural justice and the prescribed revocation procedure; here, those safeguards were not followed. The order was therefore liable to be set aside and the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:52:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 707 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325523</link>
      <description>Revocation of Central Excise registration was held invalid where it was made on a one-sided basis without prior notice, hearing, or disclosure of effective reasons. An administrative order affecting civil consequences must comply with natural justice and the prescribed revocation procedure; here, those safeguards were not followed. The order was therefore liable to be set aside and the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>