<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 705 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325521</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, permitting the accused appellant to continue on bail without the condition of depositing Rs. 200 crores. The Court directed that the trial for the alleged offence(s) should commence or continue before the competent court. This decision was made considering the prolonged stay of the bail condition and the lack of trial progress.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:52:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 705 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325521</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, permitting the accused appellant to continue on bail without the condition of depositing Rs. 200 crores. The Court directed that the trial for the alleged offence(s) should commence or continue before the competent court. This decision was made considering the prolonged stay of the bail condition and the lack of trial progress.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>