<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 699 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325515</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the petition, quashed the impugned orders, and remitted the matter to the Assessing Authority for fresh consideration. The Court directed the Assessing Authority to provide a hearing to the petitioner and consider all relevant material before making further decisions in accordance with the law. The petitioner was instructed to appear before the respondent without further notice, and the State of Karnataka was to be impleaded as a party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420941" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 699 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325515</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the petition, quashed the impugned orders, and remitted the matter to the Assessing Authority for fresh consideration. The Court directed the Assessing Authority to provide a hearing to the petitioner and consider all relevant material before making further decisions in accordance with the law. The petitioner was instructed to appear before the respondent without further notice, and the State of Karnataka was to be impleaded as a party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>