https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325510 Three injured eyewitnesses supported by medical evidence established the occurrence, and the appellant was specifically linked to the assault; the post-mortem material also corroborated the prosecution version. On that basis, the High Court's reversal of acquittal and conviction for murder and use of a deadly weapon was found justified. The plea of alibi failed because the defence evidence did not displace the prosecution case once the occurrence and the appellant's role were proved, and the alibi was found false. The conviction was upheld. en-us Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:51:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325510 Three injured eyewitnesses supported by medical evidence established the occurrence, and the appellant was specifically linked to the assault; the post-mortem material also corroborated the prosecution version. On that basis, the High Court's reversal of acquittal and conviction for murder and use of a deadly weapon was found justified. The plea of alibi failed because the defence evidence did not displace the prosecution case once the occurrence and the appellant's role were proved, and the alibi was found false. The conviction was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325510