<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 693 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325509</link>
    <description>A quasi-judicial authority does not violate natural justice by drawing conclusions from a balance sheet or other material voluntarily produced by a party, and it need not separately confront the party with every discrepancy noticed in that document. The challenge based on breach of natural justice therefore failed. Allegations of perversity were left open because rectification petitions on the same factual issues were already pending before the Tribunal, which was directed to decide those petitions on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 21:38:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 693 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325509</link>
      <description>A quasi-judicial authority does not violate natural justice by drawing conclusions from a balance sheet or other material voluntarily produced by a party, and it need not separately confront the party with every discrepancy noticed in that document. The challenge based on breach of natural justice therefore failed. Allegations of perversity were left open because rectification petitions on the same factual issues were already pending before the Tribunal, which was directed to decide those petitions on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>