https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180339 The Tribunal determined that bagasse and press mud cannot be classified as manufactured goods but are excisable goods. The demands for duty on these items were found unsustainable under Rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 due to the absence of separate accounts for exempted goods. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the demands based on Rule 6 were not valid in this case, ultimately allowing the appeal and waiving the pre-deposit of dues. en-us Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Jan 2018 13:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180339 The Tribunal determined that bagasse and press mud cannot be classified as manufactured goods but are excisable goods. The demands for duty on these items were found unsustainable under Rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 due to the absence of separate accounts for exempted goods. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the demands based on Rule 6 were not valid in this case, ultimately allowing the appeal and waiving the pre-deposit of dues. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180339