<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 251 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180337</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 79,99,950 made by the AO regarding unexplained share capital and share premium. The Tribunal found that the assessee had proven the genuineness of the transactions, emphasizing that the AO should investigate the shareholder companies instead of adding to the assessee&#039;s income. The department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT (A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2023 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 251 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180337</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 79,99,950 made by the AO regarding unexplained share capital and share premium. The Tribunal found that the assessee had proven the genuineness of the transactions, emphasizing that the AO should investigate the shareholder companies instead of adding to the assessee&#039;s income. The department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT (A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>