https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180335 The case involved the confiscation of parcels for duty evasion, with fines and penalties imposed by the Adjudicating Authority. The Commissioner of Customs ordered redemption on payment of a fine and revaluation of goods, imposing penalties based on evidence. CESTAT reduced fines considering duty differentials, providing relief to the appellants. The court upheld the admissibility of confessions as crucial evidence, rejecting arguments against them. The appeals were dismissed as no substantial legal question arose, affirming the findings of complicity in the clearance of goods. en-us Tue, 06 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 May 2016 11:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180335 The case involved the confiscation of parcels for duty evasion, with fines and penalties imposed by the Adjudicating Authority. The Commissioner of Customs ordered redemption on payment of a fine and revaluation of goods, imposing penalties based on evidence. CESTAT reduced fines considering duty differentials, providing relief to the appellants. The court upheld the admissibility of confessions as crucial evidence, rejecting arguments against them. The appeals were dismissed as no substantial legal question arose, affirming the findings of complicity in the clearance of goods. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 06 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180335