<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 136 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2739</link>
    <description>The appeal for a refund of Rs. 2,30,560 was rejected as the duty burden was found to have been passed on to buyers. The goods were cleared and transferred to a separate unit, indicating the passing on of the duty burden. The doctrine of unjust enrichment applied, leading to the denial of the refund. The appeal was dismissed, and the impugned order was upheld by the court. (Pronounced on 14-6-2007)</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 136 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2739</link>
      <description>The appeal for a refund of Rs. 2,30,560 was rejected as the duty burden was found to have been passed on to buyers. The goods were cleared and transferred to a separate unit, indicating the passing on of the duty burden. The doctrine of unjust enrichment applied, leading to the denial of the refund. The appeal was dismissed, and the impugned order was upheld by the court. (Pronounced on 14-6-2007)</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>