<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 1001 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180328</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the rejection of books of account under section 145(3) was not justified, the method of accounting followed should be accepted, administrative expenses and depreciation should be allowed, and the enhancement of assessed income by the CIT(A) was not justified. The Tribunal emphasized consistency and ruled in favor of the assessee on all grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:01:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 1001 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180328</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the rejection of books of account under section 145(3) was not justified, the method of accounting followed should be accepted, administrative expenses and depreciation should be allowed, and the enhancement of assessed income by the CIT(A) was not justified. The Tribunal emphasized consistency and ruled in favor of the assessee on all grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>