<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 134 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2737</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the demands raised against the appellants for short levy in respect of misroll were time-barred. Despite furnishing all required details to the Department in a timely manner, the show cause notice was issued after the expiration of the limitation period. The Tribunal found no suppression of facts and set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with any consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 134 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2737</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the demands raised against the appellants for short levy in respect of misroll were time-barred. Despite furnishing all required details to the Department in a timely manner, the show cause notice was issued after the expiration of the limitation period. The Tribunal found no suppression of facts and set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with any consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>