<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1645 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180316</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta held that the amendment to section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Finance Act, 2003 is retrospective and clarificatory in nature. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, directing that the benefit of the amended provision should be granted. Consequently, the Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision that denied the benefit of the amendment. The appeals were disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 14:13:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1645 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180316</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta held that the amendment to section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Finance Act, 2003 is retrospective and clarificatory in nature. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, directing that the benefit of the amended provision should be granted. Consequently, the Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision that denied the benefit of the amendment. The appeals were disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>