<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (3) TMI 55 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180311</link>
    <description>Where an assessee&#039;s business profits have been estimated, unexplained cash credits and bank deposits may still be separately assessable as income from undisclosed sources if the assessee fails to give a satisfactory explanation; the legal principle distinguishing disguised parts of estimated profits from independent undisclosed income was applied, and the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s finding that the disputed credits were unexplained and not part of the estimated profits was accepted. Consequently the further addition of the disputed amount as income from undisclosed sources was held lawful and the reference against that addition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 12:55:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (3) TMI 55 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180311</link>
      <description>Where an assessee&#039;s business profits have been estimated, unexplained cash credits and bank deposits may still be separately assessable as income from undisclosed sources if the assessee fails to give a satisfactory explanation; the legal principle distinguishing disguised parts of estimated profits from independent undisclosed income was applied, and the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s finding that the disputed credits were unexplained and not part of the estimated profits was accepted. Consequently the further addition of the disputed amount as income from undisclosed sources was held lawful and the reference against that addition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>