<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 84 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2736</link>
    <description>Processing of embroidery on grey fabrics did not attract Chapter Note 8 to Chapter 58 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, so the goods were not reclassified under Chapters 52 to 55. The Tribunal followed the Larger Bench view that embroidered fabrics remain classifiable under Chapter 58 even after processing, making the Revenue&#039;s attempt to shift classification untenable. Because the classification issue failed, the associated demand for duty could not survive, and the related questions on valuation and the effective date of the amendment became academic.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42089" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 84 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2736</link>
      <description>Processing of embroidery on grey fabrics did not attract Chapter Note 8 to Chapter 58 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, so the goods were not reclassified under Chapters 52 to 55. The Tribunal followed the Larger Bench view that embroidered fabrics remain classifiable under Chapter 58 even after processing, making the Revenue&#039;s attempt to shift classification untenable. Because the classification issue failed, the associated demand for duty could not survive, and the related questions on valuation and the effective date of the amendment became academic.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>