<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 1079 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180306</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that payments by the assessee were rightly subject to TDS under Section 194C, not Section 194J. Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was deemed unjustified for short deductions due to genuine differences in interpreting TDS provisions. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed as evidence did not universally support technical nature claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2017 18:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 1079 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180306</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that payments by the assessee were rightly subject to TDS under Section 194C, not Section 194J. Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was deemed unjustified for short deductions due to genuine differences in interpreting TDS provisions. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed as evidence did not universally support technical nature claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>