<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 689 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325505</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the exemption under section 10(22A) for the assessment year 1992-93, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A)&#039;s order. The judges emphasized adherence to Circular No.21 of 2015 on tax effect limits, remanding the matter to assess if the tax effect was below Rs. 20 lakhs. If confirmed, the appeal would be dismissed, aligning with previous decisions regarding philanthropic purposes and income sources.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 01:06:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 689 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325505</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the exemption under section 10(22A) for the assessment year 1992-93, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A)&#039;s order. The judges emphasized adherence to Circular No.21 of 2015 on tax effect limits, remanding the matter to assess if the tax effect was below Rs. 20 lakhs. If confirmed, the appeal would be dismissed, aligning with previous decisions regarding philanthropic purposes and income sources.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>