<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 675 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325491</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the Assessee by categorizing the profit on the sale of land as Long Term Capital Loss under Capital Gains. The Tribunal emphasized the genuine nature of the transaction, the property&#039;s classification as a capital asset, and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal due to lack of evidence regarding property valuation and authenticity of the sale deed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 01:05:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 675 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325491</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the Assessee by categorizing the profit on the sale of land as Long Term Capital Loss under Capital Gains. The Tribunal emphasized the genuine nature of the transaction, the property&#039;s classification as a capital asset, and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal due to lack of evidence regarding property valuation and authenticity of the sale deed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>