<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 670 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325486</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to simultaneous imposition with Section 78 being impermissible. However, the penalty under Section 78 was reduced to 50% of the amount due, subject to prompt payment, considering the Respondent&#039;s financial difficulties and timely payments. The impugned orders were upheld with modifications, allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal under specified conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 01:05:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 670 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325486</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to simultaneous imposition with Section 78 being impermissible. However, the penalty under Section 78 was reduced to 50% of the amount due, subject to prompt payment, considering the Respondent&#039;s financial difficulties and timely payments. The impugned orders were upheld with modifications, allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal under specified conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>