https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325483 The Tribunal found the duty demand against the main appellant for clandestine manufacture and clearance of dutiable gutka unsustainable, except for a duty liability of &8377;1,73,043/- with a corresponding penalty. The decision emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence and legal validity in confirming duty liabilities in cases involving alleged clandestine activities. The appeals by the main appellant and others were partially allowed due to the lack of substantial evidence supporting the duty demand. en-us Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Oct 2016 15:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325483 The Tribunal found the duty demand against the main appellant for clandestine manufacture and clearance of dutiable gutka unsustainable, except for a duty liability of &8377;1,73,043/- with a corresponding penalty. The decision emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence and legal validity in confirming duty liabilities in cases involving alleged clandestine activities. The appeals by the main appellant and others were partially allowed due to the lack of substantial evidence supporting the duty demand. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325483