<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 661 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325477</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order confirming duty for an alleged stock shortage against the appellant, a manufacturer of M.S. Ingots and M.S. Bars &amp;amp; TMT bar, due to unreliable stock verification based on eye estimation. The Tribunal ruled that no shortage conclusion could be drawn, leading to the appeal being allowed and granting consequential relief to the appellant as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2016 18:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 661 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325477</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order confirming duty for an alleged stock shortage against the appellant, a manufacturer of M.S. Ingots and M.S. Bars &amp;amp; TMT bar, due to unreliable stock verification based on eye estimation. The Tribunal ruled that no shortage conclusion could be drawn, leading to the appeal being allowed and granting consequential relief to the appellant as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>