https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325476 Section 16 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 was construed as conferring a broad review power on the Director General of Foreign Trade, exercisable suo motu or otherwise, with authority to examine the record for correctness, legality or propriety of an order. That language was treated as wide enough to extend to review of even judicial orders. The decision relied on under the Delhi Development Act, 1957 was distinguished because the two statutes were not pari materia and their schemes differed materially. The Director General was therefore held to have jurisdiction to entertain and decide the review applications, and the challenge to that power failed. en-us Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Nov 2016 16:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325476 Section 16 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 was construed as conferring a broad review power on the Director General of Foreign Trade, exercisable suo motu or otherwise, with authority to examine the record for correctness, legality or propriety of an order. That language was treated as wide enough to extend to review of even judicial orders. The decision relied on under the Delhi Development Act, 1957 was distinguished because the two statutes were not pari materia and their schemes differed materially. The Director General was therefore held to have jurisdiction to entertain and decide the review applications, and the challenge to that power failed. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325476