<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (3) TMI 334 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180272</link>
    <description>Rule 5 of the Gujarat Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1971 was upheld as constitutionally valid despite not requiring a pre-suspension hearing. The Court held that natural justice applies to administrative action, but its content depends on the subject matter and urgency; where immediate action is needed and prior notice would defeat the purpose, a hearing is not mandatory. Interim suspension of a public servant accused of demanding or accepting illegal gratification was treated as a situation justifying prompt action in public interest, and the constitutional challenge under Articles 14, 19 and 21 failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2016 13:18:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (3) TMI 334 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180272</link>
      <description>Rule 5 of the Gujarat Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1971 was upheld as constitutionally valid despite not requiring a pre-suspension hearing. The Court held that natural justice applies to administrative action, but its content depends on the subject matter and urgency; where immediate action is needed and prior notice would defeat the purpose, a hearing is not mandatory. Interim suspension of a public servant accused of demanding or accepting illegal gratification was treated as a situation justifying prompt action in public interest, and the constitutional challenge under Articles 14, 19 and 21 failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>