<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 972 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180268</link>
    <description>Compliance with Section 50 of the NDPS Act was accepted where the search record showed that the accused was informed of the right to be searched before a gazetted officer or Magistrate and declined, including written communication of that option; the conviction was therefore not disturbed on that ground. The recovered 23.5 grams of opium fell within the notified small quantity for opium, and the record supported a plea of personal consumption. To avoid miscarriage of justice, the accused was granted a further opportunity to advance a Section 27 defence before the trial court, and the conviction and sentence were set aside with remand for limited consideration of that defence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 972 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180268</link>
      <description>Compliance with Section 50 of the NDPS Act was accepted where the search record showed that the accused was informed of the right to be searched before a gazetted officer or Magistrate and declined, including written communication of that option; the conviction was therefore not disturbed on that ground. The recovered 23.5 grams of opium fell within the notified small quantity for opium, and the record supported a plea of personal consumption. To avoid miscarriage of justice, the accused was granted a further opportunity to advance a Section 27 defence before the trial court, and the conviction and sentence were set aside with remand for limited consideration of that defence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>