<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (11) TMI 431 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180267</link>
    <description>For authorisation to search, seize and arrest under Section 42 of the NDPS Act, the phrase &quot;superior in rank&quot; was construed by reference to the Delhi Police Act and the Delhi Police (Promotion and Confirmation) Rules, 1980. The statutory scheme treated Constables as the lowest police grade and showed that promotion to Head Constable is a promotion to a higher rank, with Constables placed below Head Constables in the hierarchy. On that basis, a Head Constable was held to be superior in rank to a Constable, and the challenge to the proceedings failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2016 12:51:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (11) TMI 431 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180267</link>
      <description>For authorisation to search, seize and arrest under Section 42 of the NDPS Act, the phrase &quot;superior in rank&quot; was construed by reference to the Delhi Police Act and the Delhi Police (Promotion and Confirmation) Rules, 1980. The statutory scheme treated Constables as the lowest police grade and showed that promotion to Head Constable is a promotion to a higher rank, with Constables placed below Head Constables in the hierarchy. On that basis, a Head Constable was held to be superior in rank to a Constable, and the challenge to the proceedings failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>