https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180263 The court held that the suspension order dated 3rd January 1956, which attempted to suspend the civil servant retrospectively from 31st January 1954, was invalid. It was determined that the government lacked the authority to suspend with retrospective effect, and the concept of suspension does not support such application. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the order and restraining the opponent state from enforcing it. The petitioner was also awarded costs of the application. en-us Tue, 01 Oct 1957 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Mar 2016 12:14:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180263 The court held that the suspension order dated 3rd January 1956, which attempted to suspend the civil servant retrospectively from 31st January 1954, was invalid. It was determined that the government lacked the authority to suspend with retrospective effect, and the concept of suspension does not support such application. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the order and restraining the opponent state from enforcing it. The petitioner was also awarded costs of the application. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 Oct 1957 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180263