https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180261 Search, seizure and investigation under narcotics law were found compliant because the accused were informed of the right to be searched before a Magistrate or superior officer, that right was declined, and the advance information was reduced to writing and forwarded to the superior officer. No acceptable challenge succeeded against the procedure or the forensic report. For possession of commercial quantity, the sentence was not treated as excessive because it fell within the statutory minimum and maximum and was not shown to be disproportionate on the facts. The convictions were sustained and the appeals failed on merits. en-us Mon, 08 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Mar 2016 12:00:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180261 Search, seizure and investigation under narcotics law were found compliant because the accused were informed of the right to be searched before a Magistrate or superior officer, that right was declined, and the advance information was reduced to writing and forwarded to the superior officer. No acceptable challenge succeeded against the procedure or the forensic report. For possession of commercial quantity, the sentence was not treated as excessive because it fell within the statutory minimum and maximum and was not shown to be disproportionate on the facts. The convictions were sustained and the appeals failed on merits. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 08 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180261