<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (3) TMI 361 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180259</link>
    <description>The court set aside the impugned orders, remitting the matters to the Collector of Customs to reconsider the quantum of redemption fine and penalty. The respondents were directed to pass fresh orders within two weeks after giving notice to the petitioners. The writ petitions were allowed, and no order as to costs was made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2016 11:51:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (3) TMI 361 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180259</link>
      <description>The court set aside the impugned orders, remitting the matters to the Collector of Customs to reconsider the quantum of redemption fine and penalty. The respondents were directed to pass fresh orders within two weeks after giving notice to the petitioners. The writ petitions were allowed, and no order as to costs was made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>