<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Understanding TDS: Distinction Between Sections 192 and 194J for Doctors on Retainership Versus Payroll.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=28044</link>
    <description>TDS u/s 192 or 194J - The difference between this clause in two types of agreements itself goes to prove that doctors who are engaged on retainership basis are not the servants of the assessee since they are allowed to do whatever they want except joining the similar business while other doctors who are on the pay roll of the assessee are debarred from doing any other activity apart from that of the assessee - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2016 10:51:38 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2016 10:51:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Understanding TDS: Distinction Between Sections 192 and 194J for Doctors on Retainership Versus Payroll.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=28044</link>
      <description>TDS u/s 192 or 194J - The difference between this clause in two types of agreements itself goes to prove that doctors who are engaged on retainership basis are not the servants of the assessee since they are allowed to do whatever they want except joining the similar business while other doctors who are on the pay roll of the assessee are debarred from doing any other activity apart from that of the assessee - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2016 10:51:38 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=28044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>