<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 999 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180254</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order consistent with previous decisions. The Tribunal affirmed the exemption under clause-f of rule 6DD for payments to commission agents representing farmers, finding no infirmity in the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. The appeal was dismissed, and the judgment was pronounced on 19.8.2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2016 10:46:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 999 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180254</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order consistent with previous decisions. The Tribunal affirmed the exemption under clause-f of rule 6DD for payments to commission agents representing farmers, finding no infirmity in the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. The appeal was dismissed, and the judgment was pronounced on 19.8.2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>