<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 1047 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180248</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that Chandan Processors and Ram Processors were the actual manufacturers responsible for processed fabrics, absolving the appellants of liability for excise duty. Penalties were deemed inapplicable based on legal precedent. The duty was held recoverable from Chandan Processors/Ram Processors, leading to the reversal of the order against the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:57:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 1047 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180248</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that Chandan Processors and Ram Processors were the actual manufacturers responsible for processed fabrics, absolving the appellants of liability for excise duty. Penalties were deemed inapplicable based on legal precedent. The duty was held recoverable from Chandan Processors/Ram Processors, leading to the reversal of the order against the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>