https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180249 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the duty demand and penalties imposed on the appellant firm. It found the appellant's claim for duty exemption under Notification No. 62/95-C.E. was made in good faith, supported by similar cases within the Department. The Tribunal determined that the extended period for duty demand was unjustified as there was no evidence of suppression or wilful misstatement. Therefore, the duty demand and penalties were deemed unsustainable, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellant. en-us Thu, 26 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:57:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180249 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the duty demand and penalties imposed on the appellant firm. It found the appellant's claim for duty exemption under Notification No. 62/95-C.E. was made in good faith, supported by similar cases within the Department. The Tribunal determined that the extended period for duty demand was unjustified as there was no evidence of suppression or wilful misstatement. Therefore, the duty demand and penalties were deemed unsustainable, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 26 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180249