https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180250 The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant. It held that there was no deemed cancellation of the appellant's registration, no deemed removal of goods on the date of transfer, and no basis for the demand for interest on duty payment. The tribunal emphasized the importance of proper procedures by departmental officers to prevent future disputes. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief granted to the appellant. en-us Fri, 06 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:57:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180250 The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant. It held that there was no deemed cancellation of the appellant's registration, no deemed removal of goods on the date of transfer, and no basis for the demand for interest on duty payment. The tribunal emphasized the importance of proper procedures by departmental officers to prevent future disputes. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief granted to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 06 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180250