https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180251 The Tribunal found that the impugned order was passed ex parte, violating principles of natural justice, and set it aside. The matter was remanded for de novo adjudication, directing the authority to grant the appellant sufficient time to file a reply and have a personal hearing. The Tribunal clarified it lacked the power to refer the case to the Settlement Commission, emphasizing its role in confirming, modifying, annulling, or remanding cases for fresh adjudication. The appeal was disposed of accordingly. en-us Tue, 16 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:57:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180251 The Tribunal found that the impugned order was passed ex parte, violating principles of natural justice, and set it aside. The matter was remanded for de novo adjudication, directing the authority to grant the appellant sufficient time to file a reply and have a personal hearing. The Tribunal clarified it lacked the power to refer the case to the Settlement Commission, emphasizing its role in confirming, modifying, annulling, or remanding cases for fresh adjudication. The appeal was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 16 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180251