<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 648 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325464</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions of unexplained investment and cash payment. It emphasized the importance of proper evaluation of evidence and adherence to legal provisions in income tax assessments. The Tribunal clarified that section 50C applies to sellers for capital gains and cannot be extended to tax undisclosed income in the hands of the buyer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:57:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 648 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325464</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions of unexplained investment and cash payment. It emphasized the importance of proper evaluation of evidence and adherence to legal provisions in income tax assessments. The Tribunal clarified that section 50C applies to sellers for capital gains and cannot be extended to tax undisclosed income in the hands of the buyer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>