<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 646 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325462</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found no merit in confirming the penalty for concealment under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and directed the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the penalty was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2016 15:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 646 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325462</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found no merit in confirming the penalty for concealment under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and directed the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the penalty was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>