https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325460 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to allow the claim of bad debts written off by the assessee for the assessment year 2009-10. The Tribunal found that the assessee adequately explained the treatment of bad debts in the books of account, and the AO did not dispute these facts. The appeal and cross objections were dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)'s order in favor of the assessee regarding the claim of bad debts written off. en-us Wed, 10 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:56:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325460 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to allow the claim of bad debts written off by the assessee for the assessment year 2009-10. The Tribunal found that the assessee adequately explained the treatment of bad debts in the books of account, and the AO did not dispute these facts. The appeal and cross objections were dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)'s order in favor of the assessee regarding the claim of bad debts written off. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 10 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325460