<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 625 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325441</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The case involved the recovery of a refund already made, liability of the recipient of services of Clearing and Forwarding Agents to pay service tax, and the validity of an amendment under the Finance Act, 2000 with retrospective effect. The Court emphasized the importance of compliance with statutory requirements, particularly in relation to the time limit for the recovery of refunds under Section 117 of the Finance Act, 2000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2016 18:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 625 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325441</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The case involved the recovery of a refund already made, liability of the recipient of services of Clearing and Forwarding Agents to pay service tax, and the validity of an amendment under the Finance Act, 2000 with retrospective effect. The Court emphasized the importance of compliance with statutory requirements, particularly in relation to the time limit for the recovery of refunds under Section 117 of the Finance Act, 2000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>