https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325434 The Tribunal ruled against allowing Cenvat credit on wall panels and doors, determining they did not qualify as inputs for pharmaceutical manufacturing. The allegations of wilful misstatement were dismissed, and the extended period and mandatory penalty were not imposed. The case was remanded to the primary adjudicating authority for further review within the standard one-year period. en-us Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:52:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325434 The Tribunal ruled against allowing Cenvat credit on wall panels and doors, determining they did not qualify as inputs for pharmaceutical manufacturing. The allegations of wilful misstatement were dismissed, and the extended period and mandatory penalty were not imposed. The case was remanded to the primary adjudicating authority for further review within the standard one-year period. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325434