<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 616 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325432</link>
    <description>Where exports were already admitted and no stay existed against the earlier High Court direction, the Tribunal emphasised that the adjudicating authority had to act in conformity with that binding order and exercise the discretionary power under the rebate provision accordingly. Applying judicial discipline, it held that once the fact of export stood accepted, there was nothing left to doubt on that issue and the claim had to be reconsidered in line with the higher court&#039;s instructions. The matter was therefore remanded for implementation of the High Court&#039;s direction and fresh disposal of the rebate claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:52:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 616 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325432</link>
      <description>Where exports were already admitted and no stay existed against the earlier High Court direction, the Tribunal emphasised that the adjudicating authority had to act in conformity with that binding order and exercise the discretionary power under the rebate provision accordingly. Applying judicial discipline, it held that once the fact of export stood accepted, there was nothing left to doubt on that issue and the claim had to be reconsidered in line with the higher court&#039;s instructions. The matter was therefore remanded for implementation of the High Court&#039;s direction and fresh disposal of the rebate claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325432</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>