https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325427 The court dismissed the Writ Petitions, stating that the remedy under Article 226 could not resolve private law disputes. It advised pursuing a civil suit for the recovery of demurrage charges and clarified that the 1st respondent could not be compelled to conduct an auction for such purposes. The judgment highlighted the distinction between public law and private law disputes in seeking legal remedies. en-us Tue, 08 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325427 The court dismissed the Writ Petitions, stating that the remedy under Article 226 could not resolve private law disputes. It advised pursuing a civil suit for the recovery of demurrage charges and clarified that the 1st respondent could not be compelled to conduct an auction for such purposes. The judgment highlighted the distinction between public law and private law disputes in seeking legal remedies. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 08 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325427