<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 607 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325423</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that absolute confiscation of the imported vehicle was not justified as the goods were not prohibited, allowing for redemption upon payment of a fine and customs duty. The appellant&#039;s failure to comply with import norms and policy conditions led to penalties under the Customs Act. The penalty imposed under Section 112(a) was upheld, while modifications were made to the confiscation order and penalties, ensuring adherence to relevant provisions and policies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 607 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325423</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that absolute confiscation of the imported vehicle was not justified as the goods were not prohibited, allowing for redemption upon payment of a fine and customs duty. The appellant&#039;s failure to comply with import norms and policy conditions led to penalties under the Customs Act. The penalty imposed under Section 112(a) was upheld, while modifications were made to the confiscation order and penalties, ensuring adherence to relevant provisions and policies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>