https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325421 The Tribunal invalidated the revocation of a Customs House Agent (CHA) license and forfeiture of security deposit due to lack of jurisdiction in the proceedings under CHALR, 2004. The unauthorized appointment of an enquiry officer by the Mumbai Commissioner, instead of the jurisdictional Commissioner in Delhi, and the violation of the prescribed procedure for revocation outlined in Regulation 22 led to the quashing of the order. The appeal was allowed without costs. en-us Wed, 09 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Feb 2017 14:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325421 The Tribunal invalidated the revocation of a Customs House Agent (CHA) license and forfeiture of security deposit due to lack of jurisdiction in the proceedings under CHALR, 2004. The unauthorized appointment of an enquiry officer by the Mumbai Commissioner, instead of the jurisdictional Commissioner in Delhi, and the violation of the prescribed procedure for revocation outlined in Regulation 22 led to the quashing of the order. The appeal was allowed without costs. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 09 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325421