<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 143 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2713</link>
    <description>Goods found fully packed in the factory but not entered in RG-1 records are liable to confiscation under the Central Excise confiscation provisions. The explanation that they were awaiting inspection was rejected because it was unsupported by evidence, and Rule 25 was treated as parallel to Rule 173Q for unaccounted stock found in the premises. The setting aside of confiscation was therefore unsustainable, so confiscation was upheld. On the facts, the redemption fine was reduced, and the penalty as reduced in the impugned order was not enhanced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 143 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2713</link>
      <description>Goods found fully packed in the factory but not entered in RG-1 records are liable to confiscation under the Central Excise confiscation provisions. The explanation that they were awaiting inspection was rejected because it was unsupported by evidence, and Rule 25 was treated as parallel to Rule 173Q for unaccounted stock found in the premises. The setting aside of confiscation was therefore unsustainable, so confiscation was upheld. On the facts, the redemption fine was reduced, and the penalty as reduced in the impugned order was not enhanced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>