<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 162 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2707</link>
    <description>The appeal was rejected by the Tribunal, upholding the Commissioner&#039;s decision to reject the remission application for duty on lost molasses. The Tribunal found no grounds for imposing a penalty or interest, setting them aside due to the lack of verification by Central Excise officers regarding the claimed loss.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 162 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2707</link>
      <description>The appeal was rejected by the Tribunal, upholding the Commissioner&#039;s decision to reject the remission application for duty on lost molasses. The Tribunal found no grounds for imposing a penalty or interest, setting them aside due to the lack of verification by Central Excise officers regarding the claimed loss.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>