https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180201 Camel milk was treated as food capable of human consumption, and the absence of a separate standard for that variety did not place it outside the statutory scheme. The commentary also notes that milk containing added water attracted liability under the Food Adulteration Rules, because adulteration was proved by the analyst's report and the prohibition on added water applied. On sentencing, the court accepted youth and surrounding circumstances as special reasons for leniency and reduced punishment to the minimum permissible, while affirming conviction for adulterated milk. en-us Wed, 01 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:00:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180201 Camel milk was treated as food capable of human consumption, and the absence of a separate standard for that variety did not place it outside the statutory scheme. The commentary also notes that milk containing added water attracted liability under the Food Adulteration Rules, because adulteration was proved by the analyst's report and the prohibition on added water applied. On sentencing, the court accepted youth and surrounding circumstances as special reasons for leniency and reduced punishment to the minimum permissible, while affirming conviction for adulterated milk. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 01 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180201