<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (9) TMI 179 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180200</link>
    <description>Under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, &quot;insect-infested&quot; includes infestation by dead as well as living insects because the condition of food, rather than the insects&#039; life-status, governs the expression. Adulteration under the relevant provision additionally requires that the infestation render the article unfit for human consumption. Descriptive conditions of infestation may create a presumption of unfitness but are not conclusive. Where no prescribed purity standard applies, the nature, degree and extent of infestation must be assessed on the totality of evidence; a Public Analyst&#039;s report is admissible but not determinative. The High Court&#039;s interpretation of &quot;insect-infested&quot; was reversed, while the acquittal remained undisturbed on the record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:50:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (9) TMI 179 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180200</link>
      <description>Under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, &quot;insect-infested&quot; includes infestation by dead as well as living insects because the condition of food, rather than the insects&#039; life-status, governs the expression. Adulteration under the relevant provision additionally requires that the infestation render the article unfit for human consumption. Descriptive conditions of infestation may create a presumption of unfitness but are not conclusive. Where no prescribed purity standard applies, the nature, degree and extent of infestation must be assessed on the totality of evidence; a Public Analyst&#039;s report is admissible but not determinative. The High Court&#039;s interpretation of &quot;insect-infested&quot; was reversed, while the acquittal remained undisturbed on the record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>