<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 155 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2704</link>
    <description>Under the compounded levy scheme, refixation of annual production capacity cannot sustain interest, penalty, or further recovery where the entire duty was already paid before refixation. If the duty recalculated on the refixed capacity is lower than the amount deposited, no duty remains outstanding and the basis for additional levy does not survive. The duty liability is treated as fully discharged, leaving no amount payable under the relevant rule.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42060" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 155 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2704</link>
      <description>Under the compounded levy scheme, refixation of annual production capacity cannot sustain interest, penalty, or further recovery where the entire duty was already paid before refixation. If the duty recalculated on the refixed capacity is lower than the amount deposited, no duty remains outstanding and the basis for additional levy does not survive. The duty liability is treated as fully discharged, leaving no amount payable under the relevant rule.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>