<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 947 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180190</link>
    <description>A complainant, arresting or search officer should not ordinarily investigate the same case because fairness and impartiality in investigation are essential, and such overlap can create legitimate doubt about objectivity. Applying this settled principle, the Court noted that where the same officer initiated the case and also conducted the investigation, the inquiry suffers from a serious infirmity. On the facts stated, however, the objection to the investigation was rejected and the High Court&#039;s acquittal was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2023 10:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 947 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180190</link>
      <description>A complainant, arresting or search officer should not ordinarily investigate the same case because fairness and impartiality in investigation are essential, and such overlap can create legitimate doubt about objectivity. Applying this settled principle, the Court noted that where the same officer initiated the case and also conducted the investigation, the inquiry suffers from a serious infirmity. On the facts stated, however, the objection to the investigation was rejected and the High Court&#039;s acquittal was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>